Film Noir Blogathon: Eisner’s Spirit of Noir

Here’s my entry in the For the Love of Film Noir Blogathon, hosted by Ferdy on Films and The Self-Styled Siren. This year the blogathon is raising money for the preservation and restoration of The Sound of Fury and you can donate here.

It’s Michael Chabon’s fault.

Four years ago, I was so knocked sideways by his novel The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay that I started chasing up the references. One name kept cropping up: Will Eisner. Chabon began his novel with a quote from Eisner and, in his acknowledgements, he thanked Eisner first. And once I started into reading about this Eisner bird, I found that he was considered the big cahuna of 20th century comic creators.

Alan Moore, the boss, once said that Eisner “came up with a complete philosophy of comics that applied to every detail of them, the drawing, the writing, and, most importantly, the storytelling, the kind that occurs between the drawing and the writing.” A few Ebay searches later, and I was in possession of a great deal of Eisner’s weekly adventure strip The Spirit. What struck me immediately was the visual affinity with film noir. Eisner’s cityscapes are full of deep black pools of ink, deep enough and dark enough for a reader to get lost in forever.

In Chabon’s novel, young comic creators Joe Kavalier and Sammy Clay go to see an early screening of Citizen Kane. The revelatory experience of Welles’ filmic innovations inspires them to reinvent their own chosen art form:

“Joe struggled to express, to formulate, the revolution in his ambitions for the ragged-edged and stapled little art form to which their inclinations and luck had brought them. It was not just a matter, he told Sammy, of somehow adapting the bag of cinematic tricks so boldly displayed in the movie – extreme close-ups, odd angles, quirky arrangements of foreground and background; Joe and a few others had been dabbling with this sort of thing for some time. It was that Citizen Kane represented, more than any other movie Joe had ever seen, the total blending of narration and image that was – didn’t Sammy see it? – the fundamental principle of comic book storytelling, and the irreducible nut of their partnership.”

In part, Chabon had based his Kavalier & Clay on the Will Eisner studio. Between 1940 and 1952, Eisner and his collaborators turned out a weekly 16-page supplement distributed by 20 newspapers, each one containing an eight-page Spirit story.

Eisner’s strip tells the story of Denny Colt, a detective who is murdered and comes back to life as the Spirit. Like all those embittered returning war vets, the Spirit has experienced the world of death, and lived. Visually, he’s very different from his contemporary costumed heroes. No underpants on display here – The Spirit solves crime in a blue suit and snap-brim fedora, Eisner modelling his physical appearance on Cary Grant. The one concession to the conventional superhero is the Spirit’s mask, something which Eisner was always trying to lose:

“I didn’t want him to be a superhero. Over the years, I tried so hard to get rid of his mask; he wore dark glasses for a while, and he even went blind once.”

Is the Spirit a noir hero? Well, not really. He’s far too light-hearted, for a start. Often mugging to the reader, breaking the fourth wall to shrug or smile at the events of the strip, Denny Colt is a bit too at ease with himself to qualify. He might be a dead man, but he’s hardly cadaverous. He’s even got a steady girlfriend (don’t ask how that works), Ellen Dolan, daughter of Police Commisioner Dolan, with whom the Spirit enjoys a benign relationship. And of course there’s the Spirit’s sidekick Ebony White, a black street kid whose comical patois often veers into minstrelsy. Our hero wanders down mean streets, sure, but he’s usually got company.

Crazy as a couple of waltzing mice, but at least he's got his pants on.

Many critics have drawn parallels between Eisner’s comic work and 1940s cinema, but it was an association that he was keen to discourage. He preferred to talk about the strip in terms of “stagecraft”. Discussing his experiments with blank panels, Eisner explained, “The real difference between film and this medium [comics] is in what the reader supplies. In film, the viewer gets a realistic portrait which provides everything but smell. The director has sound and vision to work with, and can provide it exactly. The viewer sits in the dark and reacts. In comics, the reader is able to supply sound, the action between panels, the way dialogue is delivered, and in this case, the background. Those are the things an artist must enable a reader to supply.”

It’s especially difficult to claim the Spirit as a noir hero due to the strip’s lack of interest in its protagonist. Noir is about psychic anguish, about being stranded in an alien city, about rushing towards your own demise. But Eisner always kept the Spirit on the sidelines, a deus ex machina who allowed him to tell quirky, subversive stories.

One always gets the sense that Eisner is more interested in his secondary characters, particularly his ever-present cast of femme fatales. While Ellen Dolan is an archetypal ‘good girl’, the Spirit often finds himself tempted by the voluptuous sirens that he encounters on his cases. Eisner sure knew how to draw a broad, and his relish is evident in the inventive names he gave them: Silk Satin, Sand Saref, Silken Floss, Lorelei Rox. The most dangerous of these, and the most compelling, was P’Gell.

The poor sap never had a chance.

Tellingly, while Eisner often played down his cinematic influences, he was happy to account for P’Gell’s ancestry: “Her jawline was inspired by Carole Lombard, who had a very sexy, provocative face. Hedy Lamarr and Marlene Dietrich are part of her, too.”

The Spirit strip’s claim to a noir reading lies in Eisner’s vision of a world ruled by fate. Unlike more recent noir comics (e.g. 100 Bullets), the strip eschews the stylistic pleasures of Hammett, Chandler or Billy Wilder. Instead, Eisner’s stories speak to an understanding of the social deprivation at the root of noir. While the Spirit enjoys a cosy existence on the outskirts of Central City, Eisner frequently takes us into the slums, showing how extreme poverty engenders cruelty and suffering. The fact that these truths are delivered with a wry sense of humour makes them even more devastating.

The splash-page for ‘The Criminal’ (2 November 1947) is typical. Over broken fences, urchins watch the lights of the big city dim as the switch is pulled on a murderer. Some of them are foreseeing their own grim future. Yet, as always with Eisner, there is humanity amid the squalor: observe the Oriols A.C. sign nailed to the shack.

Central City is a threatening, unfair place and this is often visualized through expressionistic compositions. In ‘The Partner’ (26 January 1947), a cynical tale of political racketeering, Eisner sets up the whole story in his splash page. The play of shadow and light anticipates the self-destructive greed of the main players, whose carefully wrought schemes are doomed to go up in smoke.

Most importantly, Eisner consistently shows a commitment to telling the stories of little men, guys whose desperation leads them to sin. In ‘The Killer’ (8 December 1946), we follow the life of Henry, a poor nobody working a dead-end job to support his trampish wife. Going away to war makes Henry an accidental hero, but when he returns to America, he finds that nothing has changed. He’s back where he started. And unsurprisingly, he breaks. What’s so extraordinary about this particular strip is the decision to take us “inside” Henry’s head.

It’s as though we’re pulling the trigger with Henry, momentarily enjoying his pyrrhic victory. Of course, the strip ends with him being led away in handcuffs (the Spirit is quietly sympathetic), but not without Eisner suggesting that repressed violence is an endemic problem in ante-bellum America.

No less tragic is ‘The Story of Gerhard Schnobble’ (5 September 1948), an insignificant little schlub who dreams that he can fly. After 35 years of faithful service to a bank, he fails to prevent a robbery and gets fired. Hoping to prove to the world that he’s a somebody, he leaps from the top of a skyscraper, taking wing as the city reaches up to meet him. But it’s Gerhard’s misfortune to catch a stray bullet from one of the robbers as he falls. The Spirit catches the villains, and Gerhard’s body is taken away, already forgotten by the crowd.

Or there’s Freddy in ‘Ten Minutes’ (11 September 1949), who shoots Max, a candy store owner he’s known all his life, for the coins in the cash register. “I didn’t mean it. Believe me, Max,” he screams at the smiling corpse, “I needed dough to leave town… I’m sick o’ this block… A fresh start… That’s all I want…” Seven minutes later, he is dead too, crushed by a subway carriage.

This preoccupation with fatal mistakes and desperate lives, the very essence of noir, runs through The Spirit. And without fail, Eisner ends these tales with a twist of gallows humour, a reminder that it’s all an awful joke. ‘Ten Minutes’ is a good example. As the Spirit and Dolan muse on when Freddy went bad, a passer-by comments, “What’s ten minutes in a man’s life?”

In this eight-page story, a “perfect blending of narration and image”, Will Eisner shows us that ten minutes can mean the difference between a lifetime of frustration and a cold slab in the Central City morgue.

Working Girl’s screwball roots

Halfway through Working Girl, Tess McGill (Melanie Griffith) and Jack Trainer (Harrison Ford) crash an affluent wedding reception. Tess is sure that she can convince the bride’s father to invest in her revolutionary business idea. What Jack doesn’t know is that Tess, who claims to be a hotshot executive, is actually a secretary blagging her way up the corporate ladder. Met at the door by the bride’s parents, Tess and Jack seize upon the explanation that they are “friends of Mark’s”.

As a statement of intent, the film couldn’t be clearer about its screwball aspirations. (The specific allusion is to Bringing Up Baby, in which Katharine Hepburn explains Cary Grant’s presence in Connecticut in the same way.) It’s a moment that suggests a lineage between Griffith/Ford and Hepburn/Grant.

It’s true that Jack’s discomfort with his surroundings, and his anger at Tess, recall the impotent frustration of Grant’s David Huxley. Jack grimly sucks an elaborately decorated cocktail through a straw, channelling Grant’s way with silent comedy. Even his outburst at Tess sounds like a moment from Bringing Up Baby: “You’re like one of those crazed cops, aren’t you? The kind nobody wants to ride with, because his partners all end up dead or crazy.”

The moment is so good it merits another photo:

The film has motioned toward screwball in earlier scenes. Following convention, Tess and Jack’s first encounter is a classic “meet cute”: she goes to a party to develop a business acquaintanceship with him, he hits on her at the bar, she responds without knowing who he is, he doesn’t tell her. However, while the reference to screwball is clear, this is a determinedly post-Production Code encounter. Tess ends the night by passing out from a combination of alcohol and Valium.

The physically compatible couple.

While Ford’s performance owes something to Grant, the correspondence breaks down with Griffith. She bears no resemblance to Hepburn. A more fitting comparison, given her working-class background and determination to advance without falling back on sexual wiles, might be with Jean Harlow in Wife vs. Secretary.

"You want to be taken seriously?"

"You need serious hair."

If there is a Hepburn analogue in the film, it’s – note the first name – Katharine Parker (Sigourney Weaver), who plays Griffith’s unscrupulous boss. She’s an ice-cold operator who will do anything to close a deal. Unlike her secretary, she doesn’t think twice about using sex as a weapon in the boardroom. It’s no surprise that Weaver is fantastically funny in the role (there’s a great sight gag playing on her performance as Dian Fossey); what’s unexpected are the cracks Weaver shows in her armour. Ultimately, however, the film rejects her cynicism and selfishness. Despite their shared confidence, Katharine betrays the progressive feminism inscribed in Hepburn’s persona.

When Griffith does gets her own office at the end of the film, it’s not at the expense of female solidarity. She’s successfully crossed from Staten Island to The City without rejecting her past. The final shot of the film tracks back from Tess’ office window, taking in the expanse of the skyscraper. She has found a place in the business world through her own intelligence and ambition, an inspiration to best friend Cyn (Joan Cusack) and every other working girl.

My Favourite Wife (1940)

That marvellous repository of 20th century photography, If Charlie Parker Was a Gunslinger, posted this fun image from the set of My Favourite Wife. Between takes, the film’s director Garson Kanin is throwing jacks with cast members Cary Grant, Irene Dunne and Granville Bates.

Despite the obvious staging of the shot, I do like stills from this period which aren’t conventional publicity material. Kanin looks like a real laugh riot, doesn’t he….?

My Favourite Wife is a film I’ve spent a lot of time with, it being one of the subjects of my thesis’ third chapter. It was designed to replicate the success of The Awful Truth (1937,  also starring Grant and Dunne), but it misses the verve and intelligence of that film. Perhaps it would have been a different story if Leo McCarey had been able to direct – an automobile accident meant that he was only able to act in the capacity of producer.

There are great things in the film – I particularly like Grant’s reaction on first seeing Dunne, and every scene featuring Randolph Scott – but there’s a flatness and a tiredness about the whole affair. It’s as though the film tries to pay homage to the conventions of the remarriage comedy without really understanding how those conventions operate. And I can’t forgive the film’s cruelty to Gail Patrick’s character.

Over to you, readers. Am I being too hard on My Favourite Wife?

Tony Curtis (1925 – 2010)

I was sad to hear that Tony Curtis died last week.

He had a long and eccentric career, but I’ll chiefly remember him for two things. Firstly, the strange introductions he did for Laserlight’s VHS editions of classic movies. I think they must have been recorded very quickly, as Tony makes a few flubs when reading the autocue (in one, he claimed Stan Laurel was born in 1970). Still, his enthusiasm for old Hollywood always came through. He was particularly enthusiastic when describing his friend Cary Grant, and he never missed a chance to do the impression of Grant that he made famous in Some Like It Hot (1959).

Curtis was in many great films, but his best role came with Alexander Mackendrick’s Sweet Smell of Success (1957). As the weaselly press agent Sidney Falco, Curtis exuded low cunning and cowardice. In a film where almost everybody is corrupt, Curtis plays Falco as a man desperate for respect and recognition. He’s a small timer with no scruples, an operator who keeps getting used.

Among all of the tributes to Curtis, I loved this drawing of Curtis as Sidney Falco by Sean Phillips.